Wikipedia reliable source
The short answer is yes, you can . . . but you probably shouldn't. Instead, try to find the original source from where the Wikipedia contributor got their information by looking for in-article citations. If you can find a source, it's a good idea to cite that instead, especially if it's a primary source. If there's no citation, it's time to do ...If there's an outside and reliable source documenting his view, sure. The website could be acceptable (but unnecessary given that we have the book) as an additional source to prove the quote is indeed him, but neither the website nor his book are reliable for whether his views are due weight, since his other books (particularly his advocacy of the Mosaic …
Did you know?
According to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ... Table of Contents Wikipedia, often called the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit,” is a popular online resource for the search for free knowledge and information on …research articles without citations;; websites ending in .com, .org, .net etc. NB! Wikipedia can never be considered as a reliable source of information since ...This is an explanatory essay about the the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Wikipedia's policies or guidelines thoroughly vetted by the community. Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them.When it comes to purchasing pre-owned cars, finding a trusted dealership is of utmost importance. Luther Ford Fargo has been serving the Fargo community for years, earning a reputation as a reliable source for quality pre-owned vehicles.In fact, Wikipedia systematically compensates for the lack of credentials by heavy emphasis on reliable sources. It is a paradox: Wikipedia is one of the 10 most popular websites in the world according to TopSites, and by most measures it is the most widely read knowledge repository on Earth, but still it is often treated as not worth academic ...Wikipedia is an encyclopedia—that is, a comprehensive compendium of knowledge. The threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your opinions, experiences, or arguments. Although everything on Wikipedia must be ... The idea that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for having an edit button is ridiculous. A button that is rarely used, and a button that when used incorrectly is often corrected in a quick and ...Essay About Is Wikipedia A Reliable Source - Download as a PDF or view online for freeAs of September 2015, there is no article about Jimmy Capps on Wikipedia. Capps is mentioned in Wikipedia articles such as “Night Things,” “Out Where the Bright Lights are Glowing” and others, where he is typically credited for having playe...Also, major universities will accept the site as a reliable source when citing information in a research paper, something Wikipedia can't claim. MSN Encarta MSN Encarta is another online encyclopedia that bypasses the problems that plague Wikipedia. All entries have been written and fact-checked by professionals and the site will never be ...Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement. A source can only be considered reliable when the source's qualities are compared against the qualities editors ...It is computed by summing the hub scores of all pages that point to it. If it is widely believed that Wikipedia is an unreliable source because anyone can edit it, many other pages will steer clear from citing Wikipedia, resulting in the site having a low authority score. On the other hand, a page’s hub score refers to its quality as a list ...
Reliability: State whether there is consensus that the source is generally reliable, generally unreliable, or deprecated . If there is no consensus, use neutral wording (e.g. "no consensus on the reliability of Source" instead of "no consensus that Source is reliable" ).Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created by the Wikimedia Foundation. Like other encyclopedias, Wikipedia can provide valuable information about certain topics. However, unlike encyclopedias, Wikipedia pages can be edited by anyone, which means that sometimes the information stated is not reliable and is edited for the sake of making a …The fact that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic research doesn't mean that it's wrong to use basic reference materials when you're trying to familiarize yourself with a topic. In fact, the Harvard librarians can point you to specialized encyclopedias in different fields that offer introductory information. The linked video is a reliable source and I ask to create an entry in the article, that "people are beaten in Ukraine for wearing Saint Georgian Cross as symbol of victory in Great Patriotic War". The evidence is provided. 87.78.236.178 15:35, 10 …
Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content. In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication.But it's a trustworthy source. We have to stop underestimating Wikipedia's power as a reliable information source. Rachel Cunneen. by Rachel ...…
Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Religiou. Possible cause: Language links are at the top of the page across from the title..
WikiProject source reliability, aka the Credibility Ratings + Assessments Project, is an effort to identify and aggregate online sources of assessments of the reliability and credibility of sources. These assessments include estimates of bias, verifiability of claims, level of editorial oversight or peer review, and expertise in specific topics. ... (P1433): e.g. …Many students assume that the online, free encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a valid, authoritative and useful reference source for their scholarly work as a student ...Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
What we do is find neutral ways of presenting them." That issue holds no value because many reliable sources state this event as a Genocide such as 'Genocide in Libya Shar, a Hidden Colonial History By Ali Abdullatif Ahmida'. That book follows all the requirements to be a reputable source according to Wikipedias rule about reliable sources. The ...This page in a nutshell: Ideal sources for biomedical material include literature reviews or systematic reviews in reliable, third-party, published secondary sources (such as reputable medical journals), recognised standard textbooks by experts in a field, or medical guidelines and position statements from national or international expert bodies.
About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Contribute Help; Learn to Low altitude aerial photograph for use in photogrammetry. Location: Three Arch Bay, Laguna Beach, CA. Photogrammetry is the science and technology of obtaining reliable information about physical objects and the environment through the process of recording, measuring and interpreting photographic images and patterns of electromagnetic radiant …There’s some disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source. Because it can be edited by anyone, many people argue that it’s easy for misleading information to be added to an article without the reader knowing. Others argue that because Wikipedia articles cite their sources, and because they are worked on by so ... Table of Contents. Discovering Wikipedia; a collective effort; StillDeprecation is not a blanket retroactive "ban" Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more Citing the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) on Wikipedi Citing the Internet Movie Database ( IMDb) on Wikipedia raises questions if such references do not follow the important points given in the reliable sources guideline. This is because much of the database content in IMDb is contributed by users, not by experts. Plus, the editorial oversight by IMDb staff is minimal and not stated on the site ... View _711548.docx from COMMUNICAT UCU 100 at KenyaWikipedia claims that “there are concernWikipedia makes no guarantee or claim to be a reliable source o Apr 3, 2013 · In theory, Wikipedia is closer to being reliable than it is anything else. Of course, you are always bound to come upon an entry that is un-sourced and is clearly spouting lies, but the benefit of Wikipedia is that that kind of information can be deleted with relative quickness. With any print publications, errors are only made known when the ... About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Contribute Help; Learn to ed The best way you can be a reliable source is to strictly adhere to the guidelines pertaining to them. This means to cite all information you add to articles, to be sure all information is verifiable, and not to include original research in your additions. If you get known for being a reliable source--that is, for using authoritative sources ... accuracy reliability Recommended Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing … Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Reli[Snooker statistics must be sourced to a reliable source(s), anEssay About Is Wikipedia A Reliable Source - Download Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing with the original sources provided in …Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).